Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.
MOHASCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. E. T. BARWICK MILLS, INC. and Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc., Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
In petition for rehearing appellant takes us to task for use of the words in our opinion that we are in agreement “with the result reached by the trial court,” and concludes that we have held by implication that some of the findings of the trial court were clearly erroneous and that we may have disapproved of rules of law applied by the trial court. Such interpretation is incorrect. We consider the opinion of the District Court sufficiently informative, and a correct disposition of the issues presented.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby denied, 5 Cir., 340 F.2d 319 , which affirmed D.C., 221 F.Supp. 191 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.