Mrs. Charles Jarvis v. United States of America
Mrs. Charles JARVIS Et Al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Upon careful consideration of this appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. We can add nothing to the reasoning of the trial court, and, therefore, approve the opinion and adopt it as the opinion of this Court. See Petition of the United States of America Represented by Inland Waterways Corporation, a Government Agency; and, the Inland Waterways Corporation, a Government Agency, Wholly Owned by the United States, Created by Act of Congress as a Corporation of Columbia, the Documented Owner of the River Towboat Natchez, for Exoneration from, and/or Limitation of Liability 212 F.Supp. 214 .
The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- White v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
- Andrew Anthony Aho v. United States
- United States v. Demko
- Nancy Turner, ex rel. Farrell W. Turner v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Owner of the Lucy E
- Claude Flippo v. Tennessee Valley Authority
- Roosevelt Johnson v. United States of America and Panama Canal Company, Anthony Buckner v. United States of America and Panama Canal Company
Most recent
- White v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
- Nancy Turner, ex rel. Farrell W. Turner v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Owner of the Lucy E
- Claude Flippo v. Tennessee Valley Authority
- Melancon v. Morrison-Knudsen International Co.
- Roosevelt Johnson v. United States of America and Panama Canal Company, Anthony Buckner v. United States of America and Panama Canal Company
- Andrew Anthony Aho v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.