Wayne McCollum v. James E. Bush
Wayne McCOLLUM, Appellant, v. James E. BUSH, Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Upon careful consideration, we find ourselves in agreement with nearly all of the thorough and able opinion of the district judge. While we think that the opinion of a general medical practitioner as to sanity is admissible, it seems clear to us, under the facts and circumstances of this case, that in adjudicating Bush guilty and sentencing him to life imprisonment without any psychiatric testimony, 1
the state denied Bush both a fair trial and the effective assistance of counsel. The judgment is therefore Affirmed.
1
. The only psychiatric testimony given on behalf of the appellee was that of a clinical psychologist who was required to examine Bush during a 40 minute lunch recess during the trial. It is relevant to note that when the appellee was subjected to a real psychiatric examination following remand by the United States Supreme Court, Bush v. State of Texas, 372 U.S. 586 , 83 S.Ct. 922 , 9 L.Ed.2d 958 , he was kept at the state mental hospital for treatment and observation for 89 days — thus dramatically highlighting the inadequacy of the 40 minute lunch hour period granted to the appellee’s psychologist at the trial.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 41 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Blake v. Zant
- Joe Pedrero v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Dept. Of Offender Rehabilitation, State of Florida
- Melvin W. Greer v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
- Hogan v. State
- Roland Tyler v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
- United States v. Isaac J. Taylor
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.