Mainelli v. Haberstroh
Mamie J. Mainelli and Nicholas Mainelli v. Alfred Haberstroh and Marie Haberstroh, Individually and Doing Business as Hill Top Rest, Pleasant Mount, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Mamie J. Mainelli
Opinion
344 F.2d 965
Mamie J. MAINELLI and Nicholas Mainelli v. Alfred HABERSTROH and Marie Haberstroh, Individually and Doing Business as Hill Top Rest, Pleasant Mount, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Mamie J. Mainelli, Appellant.
No. 15157.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 7, 1965.
Decided May 20, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; William J., Nealon, Jr., Judge.
Milford J. Meyer, Meyer, Lasch, Hankin & Poul, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis A. Fine, Honesdale, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Hugh J. McMenamin, Warren, Hill, Henkelman & McMenamin, Scranton, Pa. (Harvey Gelb, Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
On review of the record we find no error.
2
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed. D.C., 237 F.Supp. 190 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Legette v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
- Herrera v. Valentine
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.
- Warren Vanskike v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation
- Delores Taken Alive v. Melvin Litzau
- Spence v. Board of Education of Christina School District
Most recent
- Spence v. Board of Education of Christina School District
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.
- Warren Vanskike v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation
- Herrera v. Valentine
- Legette v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
- Besse v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.