TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Denia M. Fawcett, Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd S. Fawcett v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

Denia M. FAWCETT, Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd S. Fawcett, Appellant, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee

Fawcett v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 347 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 27, 1965
Docket
No. 21338_1
Judges
Whitaker, Rives, Jones
Citations
347 F.2d 233

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant Railroad Company in an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. §§ 51-60. The sole issue was whether the deceased, Fawcett, was an employee of the defendant within the meaning and purpose of the Act at the time of his death. That issue was fully explored by affidavits, oral testimony and exhibits. The district court held that there was no genuine issue of fact. Thinking that no reasonable man could differ with the conclusion that the deceased was not an employee of the defendant at the time he met his death, the district court entered a full opinion, findings of fact and conclusions of law, 1

and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The various relevant factors under law in determining whether the injured or killed person was an employee of the railroad carrier with respect to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act have been ruled several times by the Supreme Court.

2

After careful consideration, we find ourselves in agreement with the opinion, findings, and conclusions of the district court. The judgment is therefore Affirmed.

1

. Reported in 242 F.Supp. 675 .

2

. Baker v. Texas & P. R. Co., 1959, 359 U.S. 227, 228 , 79 S.Ct. 664 , 3 L.Ed.2d 756 ; Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 1960, 362 U.S. 396, 400 , 80 S.Ct. 789 , 4 L.Ed.2d 820 , reversing Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 5 Cir., 1959, 265 F.2d 75 ; see also Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 1958, 356 U.S. 326 , 78 S.Ct. 758 , 2 L.Ed.2d 799 . In each of the two cases first cited in this footnote, the Supreme Court referred to the Restatement of Agency 2nd. § 220 for the factors to be considered in each particular case in determining whether a person is an “employee.” (See 359 U.S. 228 , 79 S.Ct. 664 ; 362 U.S. 400 , 80 S.Ct. 789 .) All of the pertinent cases are collected in an extensive annotation in 30 A.L.R.2d 517 -529, and the Supplement Service.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 119762026peak 1976 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.526 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1976)

Most recent

  1. Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.526 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Baker v. Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co., 359 U.S. 227 (1959) 125
Ward v. Atl. Coast Line R.R., 362 U.S. 396 (1960) 74
Sinkler v. Mo. Pac. R.R., 356 U.S. 326 (1958) 215
Ward v. Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co., 265 F.2d 75 (5th Cir. 1959) 36
Fawcett v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 242 F. Supp. 675 (W.D. La. 1965) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list