TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Frederick C. Zangardi v. Walter N. Tobriner, President, Board of D. C. Commissioners

Frederick C. ZANGARDI, Appellant, v. Walter N. TOBRINER, President, Et Al., Board of D. C. Commissioners, Appellees

Zangardi v. Tobriner, 348 F.2d 370 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 22, 1965
Docket
No. 19138_1
Judges
Prettyman, Fahy, Burger
Citations
348 F.2d 370121 U.S. App. D.C. 1411965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5170

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a member of the Metropolitan Police Department, was retired under Section 4-526 (D.C.Code, 1961) for disability found not to have been contracted in the performance of duty. On appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appel-lees, Board of Commissioners, he urges that he should have been retired at the higher annuity specified by Section 4-527 (D.C.Code, 1961) since the disease which caused his disability was concededly aggravated by the performance of duty. In 1962 subsequent to appellant’s retirement, and therefore not applicable to his case, a new subsection was added to the statute by Congress. It does provide for annuity at the higher rate when disability is attributable to aggravation, due to the performance of duty, of a disease not contracted in the performance of duty. D.C.Code § 4-527(2) (Supp. IV, 1965).

On the basis of the language of the 1961 D.C.Code § 4-527, as for many years it was administratively interpreted contrarily to appellant’s position, followed by explicit Congressional acquiescence in such interpretation when in 1962 Congress amended Section 4-527 so as clearly to authorize the higher annuity for such aggravation as here occurred, we conclude that the retirement pay of appellant was properly computed under Section 4-526 rather than under Section 4-527 as it read prior to the 1962 amendment.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1965: 11975: 11983: 119652026peak 1965 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McMenamin v. Philadelphia County Democratic Executive Committee405 F. Supp. 998 (E.D. Pa. 1975)
  2. Polen v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board466 A.2d 464 (D.C. 1983)
  3. James R. Blohm v. Walter N. Tobriner350 F.2d 785 (D.C. Cir. 1965)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list