TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kenneth R. Wright v. T. W. Markley, Warden, United States Penitentiary

Kenneth R. WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. T. W. MARKLEY, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee

Wright v. T. W. Markley,, United States Penitentiary, 351 F.2d 592 (7th Cir. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 8, 1965
Docket
No. 15137
Judges
Duffy, Schnackenberg, Knoch
Citations
351 F.2d 5921965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4338

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing and discharging a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Robert A. Lucas, Esq., of the Gary, Indiana Bar is the court-appointed counsel on this appeal.

Petitioner, a sergeant in the United States army, was tried and convicted by a general court-martial of the crime of rape alleged to have been committed May 10, 1954. This offense was charged to be a violation of Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Title 10, U.S.C. § 920 .

Petitioner is now incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary at Terre Haute, Indiana. Petitioner contends that the general court-martial did not have jurisdiction to try him.

Petitioner alleges that on May 10, 1954, the United States was at peace and not “in time of War or public danger”, within the purview of the Fifth Amendment, United States Constitution. He contends that he could be tried for the crime of rape only after a presentment or indictment of a grand jury since our country was not at war and a public danger did not exist when the alleged crime was committed.

Military tribunals are not governed by the procedure for trials prescribed in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, including a trial by jury. Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1, 41, 45 , 63 S.Ct. 1 , 87 L.Ed. 3 ; Whelchel v. McDonald, 340 U.S. 122 , 71 S.Ct. 146 , 95 L.Ed. 141 . A general court-martial has jurisdiction to try a member of the armed forces in times of peace for the offense of rape. Owens v. Markley, 7 Cir., 287 F.2d 751 .

We express our thanks ^fo SoM’t-ap-pointed counsel for the meritorious service he has rendered on this appeal.

The judgment of the District Court dismissing the writ of habeas corpus is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1990: 12025: 119902026peak 1990 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Alvin W. Dodson, Jr. v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant917 F.2d 1250 (10th Cir. 1990)
  2. Livingston v. CurtisNo. 24-3128 (10th Cir. Oct. 3, 2025)

Most recent

  1. Livingston v. CurtisNo. 24-3128 (10th Cir. Oct. 3, 2025)
  2. Alvin W. Dodson, Jr. v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant917 F.2d 1250 (10th Cir. 1990)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Whelchel v. McDonald, 340 U.S. 122 (1951) 81
Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) 307

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list