TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James Durham Tyree v. United States

James Durham TYREE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Tyree v. United States, 351 F.2d 611 (5th Cir. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 11, 1965
Docket
No. 22200_1
Judges
Tuttle, Thornberry, Carswell
Citations
351 F.2d 6111965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4319

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction of the appellant of the offense of bank robbery in violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2113 (a) and 2113(b).

Appellant asserts only two grounds for his appeal. The first, that the evidence was insufficient to warrant submission to the jury of the issue of appellant’s guilt of the offenses charged, cannot be supported on the record before us. There was a positive identification by one of the employees of the bank which is adequate to warrant the jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of appellant.

The second ground of appeal, that appellant was denied constitutional rights by reason of being required to appear in a police lineup and to take certain affirmative action while in the lineup to permit the prospective witness to test her memory concerning the identity of the appellant, is not available on this record. This point was not made at any stage of the proceedings in the trial court. No facts have been developed, therefore, which would permit this Court to determine whether the principle announced by the Supreme Court in Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , 84 S.Ct. 1758 , 12 L.Ed.2d 977 , is applicable.

The judgment is affirmed, without prejudice to the right of the appellant to present his contentions touching upon his being required to appear in the police lineup by such means as may be available to him.

The Court expresses its appreciation to counsel for his services as a volunteer.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11967: 11969: 11970: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reed v. District of Columbia226 A.2d 581 (D.C. 1967)
  2. United States v. Jerry Wayne Hunter417 F.2d 296 (5th Cir. 1969)
  3. Robert Samuel Moore v. United States359 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1966)
  4. United States v. Louis Vaughn Hooper429 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1970)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Louis Vaughn Hooper429 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1970)
  2. United States v. Jerry Wayne Hunter417 F.2d 296 (5th Cir. 1969)
  3. Reed v. District of Columbia226 A.2d 581 (D.C. 1967)
  4. Robert Samuel Moore v. United States359 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964) 4,286

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list