TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Tidewater Oil Company v

Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Tidewater Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

Cont'l Oil Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, Tidewater Oil Co. v, 352 F.2d 524 (5th Cir. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 5, 1965
Docket
No. 22867-22869
Citations
352 F.2d 524

Opinion

352 F.2d 524

CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. TIDEWATER OIL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. The ATLANTIC REFINING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

Nos. 22163, 22867-22869.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 5, 1965.

Lloyd F. Thanhouser, Tom Burton, Joseph C. Johnson, Houston, Tex., for Continental Oil Co.

Edmund D. Buckley, Los Angeles, Cal., Clyde E. Willbern, Houston, tex., for Tidewater Oil Co.

Bernard A. Foster, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Atlantic Ref. Co.

Gentry Lee, C.C. Cammack, Graydon D. Luthey, R. J. Leithead, Bartlesville, for Cities Service Oil Co.

Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., F.P.C., Richard A. Solomon, Gen. Counsel, F.P.C., Washington, D.C., Billy J. Williamson, Houston, Tex., James R. Lacey, Newark, N.J., for respondent.

Before WISDOM and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

It is ordered that the joint motion of petitioners filed in the above numbered and entitled causes for an enlargement of the stay order heretofore granted by order filed January 27, 1965, in Cause No. 22163 only, so as to make that stay expressly effective as to each of the four petitioners named above be, and the same is hereby denied, it appearing that the stay orders previously entered by the other Courts of Appeals remain in full force and effect even though the cases have been transferred to this Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list