William Epton v. Frank Hogan
Opinion
355 F.2d 203
William EPTON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Frank HOGAN et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 194, Docket 29941.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 16, 1965. Decided Jan. 14, 1966.
Len Holt, Washington, D.C. (J. A. Jordan, Jr., Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for appellants.
Joel Lewittes, Asst. Atty. Gen. of State of New York (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of State of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Mortimer Sattler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Iris A. Steel, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for appellees.
Before WATERMAN, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
Appellants' complaint, concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of New York Penal Law 161 and other statutes, was dismissed with leave to amend. An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final order and therefore not appealable. See Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co., Inc., 144 F.2d 387 (2d Cir. 1944); American Broadcasting Co. v. Wahl Co., 121 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1941); 6 Moore, Federal Practice P54.12(1) at 116 (1953).
2
Appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Dorothy Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., and Stelux Manufacturing Co., and Bulova Watch Co., Inc.
- Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of Regents
- Weisman v. LeLandais
- James Haskin v. Henry R. Morton, Etc.
- Lawrence I. Weisman on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of James L. Weisman v. Pierre J
Most recent
- Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of Regents
- Dorothy Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., and Stelux Manufacturing Co., and Bulova Watch Co., Inc.
- Lawrence I. Weisman on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of James L. Weisman v. Pierre J
- Weisman v. LeLandais
- James Haskin v. Henry R. Morton, Etc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.