TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Florence Lustig Crossman

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Crossman, 356 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 10, 1966
Docket
No. 22402_1
Citations
356 F.2d 472

Opinion

356 F.2d 472

FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., Appellant, v. Florence Lustig CROSSMAN, a/k/a Florence Lustig trading and doing business as Florence Lustig, Appellee.

No. 22402.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

February 10, 1966.

Richard P. Kenney, Miami, Fla., Williams, Salomon & Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., for appellee, Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel.

Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

It is the opinion of this Court that the judgment of the district court dismissing the proceedings before it was properly entered. That judgment is 2

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list