TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. International Shoe Corporation of Puerto Rico

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL SHOE CORPORATION OF PUERTO RICO, Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Shoe Corp. of Puerto Rico, 357 F.2d 330 (1st Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 8, 1966
Docket
No. 6599
Judges
Aldrich, Maris, Coffin
Citations
357 F.2d 33061 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 25591966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6942

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this court to enforce its order directing International Shoe Corporation of Puerto Rico to bargain in good faith with Sindicato Obrero Insular, the union which on June 28, 1963 was certified after an election as the collective bargaining agent of the Corporation’s production and maintenance employees at its Manatí plants. The Corporation engaged in collective bargaining with the union for a period of about ten months after that date, but on June 24, 1964 declined to negotiate further with the union on the stated ground that it had filed the charges with the Board which later became the basis for the order here sought to be enforced.

The Corporation asserts a number of defenses against the enforcement of the order, all of which we have carefully considered and find to be without merit. It is sufficient to say that it is settled law that, absent unusual circumstances which we do not find present here, an employer is required to bargain with the certified representative of its employees for the full period of one year after certification, if that much time is necessary to reach agreement. And this is required even though the union loses its majority during the year through no fault of the employer. Brooks v. N. L. R. B., 1954, 348 U.S. 96 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 ; N. L. R. B. v. United States Sonics Corporation, 1 Cir. 1963, 312 F.2d 610 . Moreover the filing by the union of a charge of unfair labor practices does not relieve the employer of his duty to bargain collectively. N. L. R. B. v. Harris, 5 Cir. 1953, 200 F.2d 656 ; N. L. R. B. v. Taormina Co., 5 Cir. 1953, 207 F.2d 251 ; N. L. R. B. v. Kit Manufacturing Company, 9 Cir. 1964, 335 F.2d 166, 167 , cert. den. 380 U.S. 910 , 85 S.Ct. 894 , 13 L.Ed.2d 797 .

A decree enforcing the order of the Board will be entered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 119702026peak 1970 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Brooks v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 348 U.S. 96 (1954) 352
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. U. S. Sonics Corp., 312 F.2d 610 (1st Cir. 1963) 24
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taormina, 207 F.2d 251 (5th Cir. 1953) 18
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Harris, 200 F.2d 656 (5th Cir. 1953) 16
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kit Mfg. Co., 335 F.2d 166 (9th Cir. 1964) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list