TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wendell Evans v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company

Wendell EVANS, Appellant, v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRY DOCK COMPANY, Appellee

Evans v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 361 F.2d 364 (4th Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 11, 1966
Docket
No. 10354_1
Judges
Bryan, Bell, Field
Citations
361 F.2d 3641966 A.M.C. 20591966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6204

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

For serious personal injuries suffered by Wendell Evans on July 16, 1962 while working as a welder in the erection of cranes at the Virginia shipyard of the Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, he sued for damages, alleging the company’s negligence as the cause of the accident. At the time, he was in the employ of McLean Contracting Company, which had been engaged by the shipbuilding company to install two cranes. The action was dismissed— and rightly we think — on Shipbuilding’s motion for summary judgment.

Decision was grounded on the Virginia Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code of 1950, as amended, §§ 65-26 and 65-37, declaring an employee’s right to compensation under this statute to be his exclusive remedy. The Act bars suit by an employee of a contractor or sub-contractor against the owner of the project if the employee is injured in work which is “a part of the [owner’s] trade, business or occupation”. Concededly the requirements of the Act have been met and the plaintiff Evans has accepted its benefits.

The record discloses no genuine issue upon the material facts in the case and they bring him squarely within the Act.

*365 Hence his sole remedy is the recovery of statutory compensation. This was the view of the District Court in dismissing the action.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11975: 11980: 11997: 12000: 12003: 12007: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Grayce E. Corollo v. S. S. Kresge Company, D/B/A K-Mart456 F.2d 306 (4th Cir. 1972)
  2. Coulter v. United States256 F. Supp. 2d 484 (E.D. Va. 2003)
  3. Laffoon v. Bell & Zoller Coal Co.327 N.E.2d 147 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
  4. Morgan v. MDC Holdings, Inc.54 Va. Cir. 45 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2000)
  5. Bowen v. Allied Towing Corp.32 Va. Cir. 484 (Norfolk Cir. Ct. 1980)
  6. Mathes v. Davis74 Va. Cir. 411 (Norfolk Cir. Ct. 2007)

Most recent

  1. Mathes v. Davis74 Va. Cir. 411 (Norfolk Cir. Ct. 2007)
  2. Coulter v. United States256 F. Supp. 2d 484 (E.D. Va. 2003)
  3. Morgan v. MDC Holdings, Inc.54 Va. Cir. 45 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2000)
  4. Ramsburg ex rel. Estate of Ramsburg v. Target Stores, Inc.982 F. Supp. 1194 (W.D. Va. 1997)
  5. Bowen v. Allied Towing Corp.32 Va. Cir. 484 (Norfolk Cir. Ct. 1980)
  6. Laffoon v. Bell & Zoller Coal Co.327 N.E.2d 147 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list