TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Moore

United States v. Willard Moore, T/a Willard Moore Coal Company, in the Matter Of: 230.26 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Wise County, Commonwealth of Virginia

United States v. Moore, 361 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 11, 1966
Docket
No. 10331
Citations
361 F.2d 494

Opinion

361 F.2d 494

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Willard MOORE, t/a Willard Moore Coal Company, Appellant. In the Matter of: 230.26 Acres of Land, more or less, situated in Wise County, Commonwealth of Virginia.

No. 10331.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 2, 1966. Decided May 11, 1966.

Carl E. McAfee, Norton, Va. (Cline, McAfee & Pippin, Norton, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Raymond N. Zagone, Atty., Dept. of Justice (Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., S. Billingsley Hill, Atty., Dept. of Justice, and Thomas B. Mason, U.S. Atty., and James C. Roberson, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and FIELD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

In the condemnation by the United States of Willard Moore's coal leasehold interest in a tract of land in Wise County, Virginia, the District Court, on further evidence, approved an award by its Commission of $1500 as just compensation. Appealing the judgment as inadequate, the owner lays the blame for the deficiency upon unwarranted and insufficient findings of fact by the Commission and the Court. As we cannot say these determinations are clearly erroneous, we affirm. F.R.Civ.P. 71A and 53(e)(2).

2

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 119852026peak 1985 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list