TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Atkins v. Morgan

Claude George Atkins v. Judge L. L. Morgan, District Court Judge, Stevens County, Kansas, Paul A. Wolf, County Attorney, Stevens County, Kansas, L. R. Rose, Chief of Police, Ex-County Sheriff, Hugoton, Kansas

Atkins v. Morgan, 364 F.2d 822 (10th Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 28, 1966
Docket
No. 8742_1
Citations
364 F.2d 8221966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5326

Opinion

364 F.2d 822

Claude George ATKINS, Appellant, v. Judge L. L. MORGAN, District Court Judge, Stevens County, Kansas, Paul A. Wolf, County Attorney, Stevens County, Kansas, L. R. Rose et al., Chief of Police, Ex-County Sheriff, Hugoton, Kansas, Appellees.

No. 8742.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

July 28, 1966.

Certiorari Denied October 10, 1936.

See 87 S.Ct. 164 .

No appearance for appellant.

Daniel D. Metz, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Robert C. Londerholm, Atty. Gen., on the brief), for appellees.

Before HILL, SETH and HICKEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellees point out that the order appealed from dismissed the petition but did not dismiss the action, therefore, there is no appealable order. Under authority of Garrison v. Lacy, 10 Cir., 362 F.2d 798 , May Term, 1966, and Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53 , cert denied, 379 U.S. 989 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 610 , we agree that the order appealed from is not a final appealable order and that the appeal must be dismissed.

2

However, in the interest of efficient judicial administration, we believe it is appropriate to add that we have carefully considered the pleadings and the order entered dismissing the petition and agree with the trial court in that federal jurisdiction is not present in the case.

3

The appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded for the entering of a final judgment and such other action as the trial court shall deem appropriate.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 11988: 119832026peak 1983 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of Regents310 S.E.2d 675 (W. Va. 1983)
  2. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Huff851 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Huff851 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1988)
  2. Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of Regents310 S.E.2d 675 (W. Va. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Okla., a Mun. Corp., 319 F.2d 53 (10th Cir. 1963) 16
Garrison v. Lacey, 362 F.2d 798 (10th Cir. 1966) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list