TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Tower Iron Works, Inc.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TOWER IRON WORKS, INC., Et Al., Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tower Iron Works, Inc., 366 F.2d 189 (1st Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 21, 1966
Docket
No. 6728_1
Judges
Aldrich, Meentee, Coffin
Citations
366 F.2d 18963 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 21511966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4909

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.

The order forbidding respondent employer from recognizing Independent Metal Fabricators Union unless and until it wins a Board-conducted election will be enforced. Without reaching other matters discussed in the Board’s opinion, we agree that the respondent breached the duty of neutrality placed upon it by section 8(a) (2) of the National Labor Relations Act.

1

Briefly, the Iron Workers union 2

had been dealing with a multi-employer association of which respondent had been a member for over ten years. In the aftermath of unsuccessful negotiations for a new contract, followed by a strike, the association was dissolved. The Iron Workers union was not notified of this dissolution, but, rather, was affirmatively misled by respondent into believing that the association was still in existence. As a result Iron Workers continued to attempt to deal with the association rather than its individual members, including respondent.

In the meantime Independent conducted an organizing campaign among respondent’s employees. Having obtained a card majority, it made a demand for recognition by the respondent, which was promptly granted. Immediately thereafter respondent and Independent entered into a collective bargaining agreement. Since Iron Workers had no knowledge of the dissolution of the association, it had no reason to believe that respondent’s employees had become an appropriate unit which it should attempt to organize separately.

*191 Respondent’s conduct was not a mere recognition of a fait accompli, as in NLRB v. Air Master Corp., 3 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 553 . As the Board found, respondent “not only frustrated any further joint bargaining, but also deterred Iron Workers from separate bargaining.” Possibly Independent would have succeeded in organizing respondent’s employees in any event, but by leading Iron Workers not to enter the competition, respondent improperly handicapped that union until it was too late.

1

. 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a) (2).

2

. Local 523, International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, AFL-CIO.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 21973: 219682026peak 1968 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list