United Electrical Contractors Association v. Arnold Ordman
UNITED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Arnold ORDMAN Et Al., Defendants-Respondents
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Appellants filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board. The General Counsel of the Board declined to issue complaints upon the charges. Plaintiffs instituted an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the General Counsel and the members of the Board seeking there a declaratory judgment setting forth plaintiffs’ rights under the Labor Management Relations Act as charging parties whose charges did not result in the filing of NLRB complaints, and further seeking a mandatory injunction to compel the General Counsel to issue unfair labor practice complaints on their charges.
The defendants-appellees moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction over the subject matter. The court below granted the motion and this appeal followed.
We agree with the court below that upon petitions for a declaration of rights by disappointed charging parties the district courts may not review the day-today exercise of the discretion given to the General Counsel in the issuance of Board unfair labor practice complaints, and we affirm the result reached below. The opinion of the district court is reported at 51 CCH Lab.Cas. jf 19,761 (p. 33,949) (1965).
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that “district courts may not review the day-to-day exercise of the discretion given to the General Counsel in the issuance of Board unfair labor practice complaints.”)
-
(District Court may not review General Counsel's exercise of discretion)
Cited by 39 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals20
- Federal District Courts11
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts3
- Territorial Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
- United Farm Workers of America v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board
- Vaca v. Sipes
- Belridge Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pincus Brothers, Inc.-Maxwell
- Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
- Al Mumford v. James M. Glover
Most recent
- Holly Jarvis v. National Labor Relations Board, et. al.
- Barber v. D.C. Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges
- Federación de Maestros de Puerto Rico v. Molina Torres
- Federacion De Maestros De Puerto Rico v. Maria M. Molina Torres
- Samuel M. Rizzitelli v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
- Becker v. National Labor Relations Board
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.