Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Robert Gatewood v. Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of County Prisons
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Ex Rel. Robert GATEWOOD, Appellant, v. Edward J. HENDRICK, Superintendent of County Prisons, Et Al.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.
This is in effect a civil action, quite improperly captioned, by Robert Gate-wood, a prisoner in the Philadelphia County Prison, for damages under section 1979 of the Revised Statutes, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 , for alleged deprivation under color of state law of rights secured by the federal Constitution and laws. What Gatewood complains of is alleged improper medical treatment by the prison authorities. This, however, if true was not a denial of rights secured by the federal Constitution or laws. Threatt v. State of North Carolina, D.C.N.C.1963, 221 F.Supp. 858 . Gatewood’s claim is, therefore, not cognizable under section 1979 of the Revised Statutes, the Civil Rights Act of 1871, as the district court quite properly held. United States ex rel. Lawrence v. Ragen, 7 Cir. 1963, 323 F.2d 410 ; Snow v. Gladden, 9 Cir. 1964, 338 F.2d 999 .
The order of the district court will be affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“improper medical treatment * * * not cognizable” under § 1983)
Cited by 27 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Jack Gittlemacker v. Arthur T. Prasse, Commissioner of Prisons of Pa. And Frank C. Johnston, Warden, State Correctional Institution, Dallas, Pa
- Carl C. Coppinger v. Gene Townsend, M.D., and Wayne K. Patterson
- Polite v. Diehl
- James Hoey Fear v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and R. K. Johnson, Warden, York County Prison, York, Pennsylvania
- John R. Conner v. Joseph F. Salzinger, Sr., Warden, Leroy Zimmerman, District Attorney, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania
- Campbell v. Anderson
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.