TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kwang Shick Myung v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

KWANG SHICK MYUNG, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

Kwang Shick Myung v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 368 F.2d 330 (7th Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 2, 1966
Docket
No. 15409_1
Judges
Major, Knoch, Fairchild
Citations
368 F.2d 3301966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of deportation, denying his application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C.A. sec. 1254 (a) (1).

The critical issue is whether deportation of petitioner would cause him “extreme hardship.” Petitioner argues that the inquiry officer applied an improper standard in finding that it would not.

Petitioner is 26 years old. He came to the United States from Korea at age 18, after completing high school. He attended college here, studying political science, and received a degree. He has attended *331 law school and is employed by a patent law firm. His family, consisting of his mother, three brothers, and a sister live in Korea. Although he believes the only employment he could secure in Korea would be in his brother’s fishing business, one brother is a newspaper editor and the other a publisher. He testified that he would be unable to read intellectual writing in Korean because Chinese characters are used. These forms are taught at college level, and petitioner had his college work in the United States.

Petitioner testified: “I am to'o much Americanized at this moment to return to Korea and struggle for my living.”

The inquiry officer was convinced that petitioner’s life in Korea would be different from that in the United States, and that he would not be able to obtain employment comparable to that in the United States, but concluded that “these facts alone do not constitute extreme hardship.”

We cannot conclude that the hearing officer applied an improper standard, nor that the finding was arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion.

The order is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 11972: 31981: 119682026peak 1972 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Behzad Kasravi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service400 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1968)
  2. SIPUS14 I. & N. Dec. 229 (BIA 1972)
  3. LAM14 I. & N. Dec. 98 (BIA 1972)
  4. Miguel Mendoza-Hernandez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service664 F.2d 635 (7th Cir. 1981)
  5. Chung Wook Myung v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service468 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1972)

Most recent

  1. Miguel Mendoza-Hernandez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service664 F.2d 635 (7th Cir. 1981)
  2. Chung Wook Myung v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service468 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1972)
  3. SIPUS14 I. & N. Dec. 229 (BIA 1972)
  4. LAM14 I. & N. Dec. 98 (BIA 1972)
  5. Behzad Kasravi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service400 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list