TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The Life Insurance Company of Virginia v. Leroy J. Shifflet, as De Bonis Non of the Estate of Florence I. Shifflet, Deceased

The LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, Appellant, v. Leroy J. SHIFFLET, as Executor De Bonis Non of the Estate of Florence I. Shifflet, Deceased, Appellee

The Life Ins. Co. of Va. v. Shifflet, 370 F.2d 555 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 4, 1967
Docket
No. 22549
Judges
Rives, Coleman
Citations
370 F.2d 555

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The decision of this case turns upon the proper construction of Section 627.01081 of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A. as a part of the Florida Insurance Code enacted October 15,1959, now appearing as Chapter 59-205 of the Florida General Laws of 1959. This Court held ( 359 F.2d 501 ) that, in his application for the policy of insurance on which this suit is based, Earl C. Shifflet “made clearly incorrect statements of fact on highly material matters, but he did not know they were incorrect.” Under this Court’s construction of the Florida statutes above cited, if the applicant did not know that the statements were incorrect, or failed to recall them, there was no misrepresentation, but if he falsely answered one or more of such statements with knowledge of the falsity, then there could be no recovery.

Subsequent to the decision in this cause, the District Court of Appeals for the Second District of Florida rendered its decision in Douglas v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, 191 So.2d 483 (opinion filed October 12, 1966), which reaches a result, on facts somewhat similar to those of the case at bar, apparently contrary to this Court’s decision. On November 22, 1966, the petition for rehearing filed by the appellant in said cause was denied without opinion. We are informed that no application for writ of certiorari will be made in said cause. The result is that this Court is now in doubt as to the rule of construction of the Florida statutes above cited which would be applied by the Supreme Court of Florida under the facts and circumstances of this case.

In view of the importance of the question, this Court has decided to grant the appellant’s petition for rehearing to the extent necessary to certify such question or proposition of the laws of Florida, pursuant to the provisions of Section 25.-031 Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and Rule 4.61 Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. See Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. v. Clay, 5 Cir. 1959, 265 F.2d 522 , Vacated and Remanded (1960) 363 U.S. 207 , 80 S.Ct. 1222 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1170 ; Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. v. Clay, Fla.1961, 133 So.2d 735 ; same case, 5 Cir. 1963, 319 F.2d 505 ; Green v. American Tobacco Company, 5 Cir. 1962, 304 F.2d 70, 85, 86 ; same case, Fla.1963, 154 So.2d 169 ; same case, 5 Cir. 1963, 325 F.2d 673 .

The parties are requested to stipulate, if possible, the contents of the certificate as provided for in said rule. If they are unable so to stipulate, they should report to this Court their respective views on or before February 6, 1967.

1

To such extent the petition for rehearing is Granted.

1

. Such report may be typed, and accompanied by brief which may also be typed, at least four legible copies to be filed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 21 cases

View all citing references →
1967: 21968: 31969: 11971: 31972: 41973: 21974: 11975: 11977: 419672026peak 1972 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 9

DepthCaseCited by
Clay v. Sun Ins. Office, 363 U.S. 207 (1960) 205
Sun Ins. Office v. Clay, 133 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1961) 74
Green v. Am. Tobacco Co., 304 F.2d 70 (5th Cir. 1962) 67
Green v. Am. Tobacco Co., 154 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1963) 56
Green v. Am. Tobacco Co., 325 F.2d 673 (5th Cir. 1963) 43
Sun Ins. Office v. Clay, 319 F.2d 505 (5th Cir. 1963) 36
The Life Ins. Co. of Va. v. Shifflet, 359 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1966) 16
Sun Ins. Office v. Clay, 265 F.2d 522 (5th Cir. 1959) 13
Douglas v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 191 So. 2d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list