TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dendy Robert Sligh v. Columbia, Newberry and Laurens Railroad Company

Dendy Robert SLIGH, Appellant, v. COLUMBIA, NEWBERRY AND LAURENS RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee

Dendy Robert Sligh v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens R.R. Co., 370 F.2d 979 (4th Cir. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 23, 1966
Docket
No. 10651_1
Judges
Bryan, Winter, Craven
Citations
370 F.2d 9791966 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Suing under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., Dendy Robert Sligh asked damages from the Columbia, Newberry and Laurens Railroad Company, for injuries he suffered because of the railroad’s alleged negligence. The fault charged was the railroad’s failure to provide sufficient employees for the job when they were required to raise and move a motor car from the rails. Further neglect, the plaintiff declared, was found in the railroad’s inadequate maintenance of the track bed which denied the plaintiff-employee a secure footing in this work. In these circumstances the weight of the car, Sligh charges, overburdened the employees engaged in the movement, causing him severe and permanent back injuries.

The parties stipulated for a trial without a jury, and the District Judge on conflicting evidence found no negligence on the part of the railroad which “played some part in producing an injury to the plaintiff”. Judgment for the defendant followed.

From our examination of the record, on Sligh’s appeal, we cannot say that these fact findings were “clearly erroneous”, F.R.Civ.P. 52(a); nor do we observe error of law in the trial. The judgment of dismissal must stand.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 219832026peak 1983 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list