TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James H. White, Jr. v. United States

James H. WHITE, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

White v. United States, 377 F.2d 948 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 14, 1967
Docket
No. 20542_1
Judges
Fahy, McGowan, Per Curiam, Tamm
Citations
377 F.2d 948126 U.S. App. D.C. 3091967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6740

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

An indictment of appellant for unauthorized use of a vehicle, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-2204, was dismissed by the District Court December 9, 1965. Upon consideration of the record relating to the dismissal we conclude that it was with prejudice. Nevertheless, a few days thereafter, December 15, 1965, appellant was again indicted for the same offense.

1

His motion to dismiss the second indictment due to the bar created by the earlier dismissal with prejudice was denied. We think it should have been granted. The dismissal with prejudice constituted an adjudication which barred another prosecution for the same offense. United States v. Oppenheimer, 242 U.S. 85 , 37 S. Ct. 68 , 61 L.Ed. 161 ; District of Columbia v. Weams, 208 A.2d 617, 619 (D.C. Mun.App.). Appellant’s conviction under the second indictment, now before us on this appeal, accordingly must be set aside and the case remanded for dismissal of that indictment.

It is so ordered.

1

. See Mann v. United States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 304 F.2d 394 , where dismissal of the indictment was granted explicitly without prejudice and reindictment was held proper.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 11971: 11973: 11975: 11980: 21982: 11995: 11996: 12003: 12007: 119702026peak 1980 · 2

Most recent

  1. United States v. Bowman496 F.3d 685 (D.C. Cir. 2007)
  2. United States v. Flemmi283 F. Supp. 2d 400 (D. Mass. 2003)
  3. Sharoc Richardson v. Denise M. Quarles85 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 1996)
  4. State v. Mageo889 P.2d 1092 (Haw. App. 1995)
  5. State v. Sessoms455 A.2d 595 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1982)
  6. Creek v. Clark414 N.E.2d 816 (Ill. App. Ct. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Oppenheimer, 242 U.S. 85 (1916) 326
Mann v. United States, 304 F.2d 394 (D.C. Cir. 1962) 82
Dist. of Columbia v. Weams, 208 A.2d 617 (D.C. 1965) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list