TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Leon D. Phillips v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Georgia

Leon D. PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. A. L. DUTTON, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Georgia, Appellee

Phillips v. A. L. Dutton,, Ga. State Prison, Reidsville, Ga., 378 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 15, 1967
Docket
No. 24208
Judges
Coleman, Ainsworth, Cars-Well
Citations
378 F.2d 8981967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6006

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the Fulton County, Georgia, Superior Court of larceny from the house and sentenced on March 8, 1960 to a term of eight years. On August 4, 1960, he left the penitentiary and was not returned until December 2, 1965. Prior to filing the present petition, a similar petition for habeas corpus was filed in the Reidsville, Georgia, City Court and denied. He testified that on August 4, 1960, while then serving his sentence, he was sent to the Battey State Hospital, Prison Branch, in Rome, Georgia, and was told by the Warden that he was released. The official records of the Georgia State Prison, testified to by Charles R. Balkeom, show that he escaped from incarceration on that date and was not returned until December 2, 1965 when custody was secured from the Florida State Prison where he had most recently been serving a five-year sentence. The Georgia prison records disclose no evidence of a release such as appellant asserts.

Appellant contends that having been sentenced on March 8, 1960 to eight years’ imprisonment, his normal release date would be March 1968 and under allowances for statutory good time he is now eligible for release. However, he has not carried the burdei^of proving his allegations by a preponderance of the evidence (see Williams v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 354 F.2d 698 ), nor are we convinced that the findings of the district court on conflicting evidence should be disturbed since they are not clearly erroneous. In fact, we agree with them. See Post v. Boles, 4 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 738 , cert. den. 380 U.S. 981 , 85 S.Ct. 1346 , 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965).

We hold, therefore, that the writ was properly denied because appellant’s Georgia state sentence was tolled by his escape and the time of his imprisonment did not again begin to run until his return to the Georgia State Prison on December 2, 1965. Obviously, he has not yet served his eight-year sentence.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 11969: 11975: 11977: 11981: 12005: 12020: 119682026peak 1968 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Williams v. Beto, 354 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1966) 250
Post v. Boles, 332 F.2d 738 (4th Cir. 1964) 25

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list