TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bland v. Hopewell Yacht Club, Incorporated

Jacqueline P. Bland, of the Estate of Homer Isaac Bland, Deceased v. The Hopewell Yacht Club, Incorporated, United States of America, American Power Boat Association, William A. Ritner, Sr., and Calvert Skeeter Johnson

Bland v. Hopewell Yacht Club, Inc., 378 F.2d 934 (4th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 5, 1967
Docket
No. 11236
Citations
378 F.2d 9341967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6118

Opinion

378 F.2d 934

Jacqueline P. BLAND, Executrix of the Estate of Homer Isaac Bland, deceased, Appellant, v. The HOPEWELL YACHT CLUB, INCORPORATED, United States of America, American Power Boat Association, William A. Ritner, Sr., and Calvert Skeeter Johnson, Appellees.

No. 11236.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 31, 1967.

Decided June 5, 1967.

Harry P. Anderson, Jr., Richmond, Va. (D. R. Taylor, Williamsburg, Va., and Satterfield, Haw, Anderson, Parkerson & Beazley, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Harvey M. Katz, Attorney, Department of Justice (Barefoot Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John C. Eldridge, Attorney, Department of Justice, and Claude V. Spratley, Jr., U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee United States of America.

Edward E. Lane, Richmond, Va. (Robert L. Taylor, Richmond, Va., and William A. Smith, Staten Island, N. Y., on brief), for other appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This suit grows out of a collision between two hydroplanes, racing boats in the "266-cubic-inch class," at a race meet in which one of the drivers was killed. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the death of the deceased driver.

2

The District Court found that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the negligence of the deceased and entered judgment for the defendants. We find ample support in the record for the findings, conclusions and judgment below.

3

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list