TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

T. A. Buchanan, in His Capacity as Sheriff and Ex Officio Jailer of Dade County, Florida v. United States of America ex rel. Lillian Reis

T. A. BUCHANAN, in His Capacity as Sheriff and Ex Officio Jailer of Dade County, Florida, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America Ex Rel. Lillian REIS, Appellee

T. A. Buchanan, in His Capacity as Sheriff & Ex Officio Jailer of Dade Cnty., Fla. v. United States ex rel. Lillian Reis, 379 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 11, 1967
Docket
No. 24183
Judges
Rives, Ainsworth, Johnson
Citations
379 F.2d 6121967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5666

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is another “thwarted appeal” case 1

where, in a habeas corpus proceeding, the United States District Court, after determining that the petitioner Reis had been denied in the Florida courts the equal protection of the laws by the refusal of a transcript in forma pauperis for appeal purposes, ordered, as an alternative to petitioner’s release, that the Florida Appellate Court accept the notice of appeal to review the convictions or reinstate the previously dismissed appeal. The District Court’s determination that the petitioner was denied, by refusal of a transcript, the equal protection of the laws by the State court is not contested on this appeal; further, the State is not contending that petition *613 er’s convictions should not receive a full appellate review in the Florida courts. The sole issue now presented concerns the method by which that review is to be obtained. The State contends that under Florida’s Criminal Procedure Rule No. One, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, the habeas petitioner, after having been thwarted on appeal, may, upon proper application, obtain a direct review of criminal convictions.

2

While ordinarily, the procedure to be followed in securing appellate review of state court criminal convictions is and should be left to the states, here the District Judge has expressly, after thorough examination of the applicable Florida appellate processes, exercised his discretionary authority in ordering alternative methods of review whereby petitioner may be made whole. In consideration of the facts in this particular case and as specifically authorized by Title 28, § 2106, United States Code, we feel that such action on the part of the District Judge was “just under the circumstances.”

Affirmed.

1

. Pate v. Holman, 341 F.2d 764 (5th Cir. 1965), modified on rehearing, 343 F.2d 546 ; Wainwright v. Simpson, 360 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 1966).

2

. Murray v. State, 131 So.2d 292, 294 (Fla.App.1966).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 21969: 21976: 21978: 11982: 11988: 119682026peak 1968 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Pate v. William C. Holman,, Kilby Prison, Ala., 341 F.2d 764 (5th Cir. 1965) 122
Wainwright v. Simpson, 360 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 1966) 70
Pate v. William C. Holman,, Kilby Prison, Ala., 343 F.2d 546 (5th Cir. 1965) 56
Parish Council of Parish of East Baton Rouge v. La. Highway & Heavy Branch of Associated Gen. Contractors, Inc., 131 So. 2d 272 (La. Ct. App. 1961) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list