TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Corinne Anne Staigg Neagle v. Ruth Dalton Johnson, Harvey Bailie and Lizzie Bailie

Corinne Anne Staigg NEAGLE, Appellant, v. Ruth Dalton JOHNSON, Harvey Bailie and Lizzie Bailie, Appellees

Corinne Anne Staigg Neagle v. Johnson, 381 F.2d 9 (8th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 21, 1967
Docket
No. 18712_1
Judges
Vogel, Blackmun, Heaney
Citations
381 F.2d 9

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to quiet title. Jurisdiction in the federal courts was based upon diversity of citizenship and the amount involved. It was tried to the court without a jury. Motions for summary judgment were filed by each of the parties. The District Court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This appeal followed.

The complaint and other pleadings allege diversity of residence instead of diversity of citizenship. That omission was first noticed at the time of the argument in this court. We are, however, convinced, from a consideration of the record as a whole, from the stipulations of counsel for the respective parties, and from amended pleading filed in this court, that diversity of citizenship did, in fact, exist, establishing jurisdiction in the federal courts. Accordingly, we feel justified in accepting the *10 pleadings as having been amended to conform with the facts. See, Burkhardt v. Bates, 8 Cir., 1962, 296 F.2d 315, 316 ; National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. Fisher, 8 Cir., 1960, 284 F.2d 421, 423 ; Texaco-Cities Service Pipe Line Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 8 Cir., 1960, 283 F.2d 144, 145 .

Judge Regan, in his opinion reported at 261 F.Supp. 634 , has very carefully analyzed and correctly determined the issues involving Missouri law in this case. We are in accord with the opinion as published, adopt it, and on the basis thereof this case is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 21989: 119792026peak 1979 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Vargas v. McNamara608 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1979)
  2. Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc.719 F. Supp. 751 (N.D. Ind. 1989)
  3. Harold Vargas v. Robert C608 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc.719 F. Supp. 751 (N.D. Ind. 1989)
  2. Harold Vargas v. Robert C608 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1979)
  3. Vargas v. McNamara608 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Nat'l Farmers Union Prop. & Cas. Co. v. Fisher, 284 F.2d 421 (8th Cir. 1960) 34
Texaco-Cities Serv. Pipe Line Co. & Clell Hedgpeth & Frank Stewart v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 283 F.2d 144 (8th Cir. 1960) 23
Burkhardt v. Bates, 296 F.2d 315 (8th Cir. 1962) 17
Neagle v. Johnson, 261 F. Supp. 634 (E.D. Mo. 1966) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list