Irvine K. Furman and Lorena K. Furman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Irvine K. FURMAN and Lorena K. Furman, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This case involves the validity for federal income tax purposes of a so-called “Clifford Type Trust”.
1
The Tax Court in a decision reported at 45 T.C. 360 , found upon undisputed and almost entirely stipulated facts that the Trust lacked “economic reality”, and should not be recognized for tax purposes. For the reasons given and upon the authorities cited by the Tax Court, we affirm. ,See Van Zandt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir. 1965, 341 F.2d 440 , certiorari denied, 382 U.S. 814 , 86 S.Ct. 32 , 15 L.Ed.2d 62 . Compare, Skemp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 7 Cir. 1948, 168 F.2d 598 .
Affirmed.
1
. See Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331 , 60 S.Ct. 554 , 84 L.Ed. 788 ; and Internal Revenue Code of 1954, Secs. 671-678 (26 U.S.C. 1964 Ed., Secs. 671-678).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 67 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.