TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Walker Park Realty, Inc.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WALKER PARK REALTY, INC., Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Walker Park Realty, Inc., 383 F.2d 732 (2d Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 28, 1967
Docket
Nos. 48, Docket 31385
Judges
Lumbard, Smith, Kaufman
Citations
383 F.2d 7321967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5007

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York awarding a deficiency judgment against appellant in this mortgage foreclosure action brought by the United States. The question raised is whether a deficiency judgment may be entered after the foreclosure sale where the original judgment of foreclosure and sale directed the master to report the amount of any deficiency but did not expressly provide for the subsequent entry of a deficiency judgment.

Since federal law applies in an action by the United States to foreclose a mortgage insured by and assigned to the FHA, e. g., United States v. View Crest Garden Apts., Inc., 268 F.2d 380 (9 Cir. 1959), the New York cases cited by appellant are not controlling. In the present case the complaint requested a deficiency judgment and appellant, who had personally assumed the mortgage, was personally served. The judgment of foreclosure and sale, entered upon appellant’s default, awarded the plaintiff judgment in the sum of $1,011,854.11, the total amount due on the mortgage. The judgment also ordered the sale of the mortgaged premises, appointed a master to carry out the sale, and directed the master to report the amount of any deficiency if the proceeds of the sale were insufficient to satisfy the judgment.

In these circumstances, we think it was sufficiently clear that the original judgment was a personal judgment against appellant for the full amount due on the mortgage and that it contemplated the further entry of a deficiency judgment if a deficiency were found to exist after the foreclosure sale.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1968: 41970: 21971: 11972: 11973: 11974: 119682026peak 1968 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.425 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1970)
  2. United States v. Wells403 F.2d 596 (5th Cir. 1968)
  3. United States v. John v. O'COnnell and Jopat Realty Corporation496 F.2d 1329 (2d Cir. 1974)
  4. United States v. Merrick Sponsor Corp.421 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir. 1970)
  5. United States v. Munroe Towers, Inc.286 F. Supp. 92 (D.N.J. 1968)
  6. United States v. McIntyre Veneer, Inc.343 F. Supp. 1095 (M.D. La. 1972)

Most recent

  1. United States v. John v. O'COnnell and Jopat Realty Corporation496 F.2d 1329 (2d Cir. 1974)
  2. United States v. Stewart361 F. Supp. 1161 (D. Neb. 1973)
  3. United States v. McIntyre Veneer, Inc.343 F. Supp. 1095 (M.D. La. 1972)
  4. United States v. Mackenzie322 F. Supp. 1058 (D. Nev. 1971)
  5. United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.425 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1970)
  6. United States v. Merrick Sponsor Corp.421 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. View Crest Garden Apts., Inc., 268 F.2d 380 (9th Cir. 1959) 76

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list