Charlie Bob Wesley v. United States
Charlie Bob WESLEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
There was ample evidence to support appellant’s conviction of forgery. His opportunity rendered him a natural object of suspicion. His identification as the forger by the Government’s handwriting expert was convincing, and he offered no rebuttal expert testimony.
There is no support whatsoever for appellant’s contention that the trial judge demonstrated bias.
Appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated when handwriting exemplars were secured from him. Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 266-267 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.