V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States

V. E. B. CARL ZEISS, JENA, Steelmasters, Inc. and Ercona Corporation, Appellants, v. Ramsey CLARK, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Appellee

V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney Gen. of the United States, 384 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: November 13, 1967
Docket: No. 20351
Judges: Edgerton, Burger, Wright
Citations: 384 F.2d 979

Cited by 72 4 descriptions by later courts Original from court

Opinion — Per Curiam

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court, appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed for the reasons stated in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, D.D.C., 40 F.R.D. 318 (1966).

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(quoted in NLRB v. Sears, 421 U.S. 132, 150, 95 S.Ct. 1504, 1516, 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975))

CACI Field Servs., Inc. v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 680 (Ct. Cl. 1987)
(deliberations within the Justice Department)

Black v. Sheraton Corp. of Am. Appeal of United States, 564 F.2d 531 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

Cited by 72 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Verrazzano Trading Corp. v. States358 F. Supp. 273 (Cust. Ct. 1973)
Fred B. Black, Jr. v. Sheraton Corporation of America Appeal of United States of America564 F.2d 531 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation478 F. Supp. 577 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)
Freeman v. Seligson405 F.2d 1326 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
Hamilton, Superintendent v. Verdow414 A.2d 914 (Md. 1980)
United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.86 F.R.D. 603 (D.D.C. 1979)

Most recent

Can Softtech, Inc v. United StatesNo. 24-1009 (Fed. Cl. May 8, 2026)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc.No. 1:20-cv-10832 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2022)
United States ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.254 F.R.D. 35 (D. Mass. 2008)
Alpha I, L.P. v. United States83 Fed. Cl. 279 (Fed. Cl. 2008)
Miller v. Mehltretter478 F. Supp. 2d 415 (W.D.N.Y. 2007)
Vons Companies, Inc. v. United States51 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, 40 F.R.D. 318 (D.D.C. 1966)	229

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list