United States of America ex rel. Francis O'HallOran v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES of America Ex Rel. Francis O’HALLORAN, Appellant, v. Alfred T. RUNDLE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

United States ex rel. Francis O'HallOran v. Rundle, 384 F.2d 997 (3d Cir. 1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: October 30, 1967
Docket: No. 16724
Judges: Hastie, Freedman, Seitz
Citations: 384 F.2d 997

Cited by 11 Original from court

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by a state prisoner from a judgment denying him a writ of habeas corpus.

In the circumstances of this ease, we rule that the taking of the appellant’s fingerprints in open court, over his objection, was not a denial of fair trial or inconsistent with due process of law. No other point of substance is properly before us on this appeal.

The judgment will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Commonwealth v. Keeler264 A.2d 407 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)
Commonwealth v. Jefferson281 A.2d 852 (Pa. 1971)
State v. Anderson528 P.2d 1003 (Wash. Ct. App. 1974)
United States v. Robert Lee Doremus, Sr.414 F.2d 252 (6th Cir. 1969)
State v. Jamerson518 P.2d 779 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974)
State v. House320 So. 2d 181 (La. 1975)

Most recent

State of Tennessee v. Detrick ColeNo. W2002-01254-CCA-R3-DD (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 24, 2003)
State v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (6-19-2003)No. 81692 81693. (Ohio Ct. App. June 19, 2003)
Commonwealth v. Moyer461 A.2d 853 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983)
United States v. Jacqueline Peters and Pamela Teller687 F.2d 1295 (10th Cir. 1982)
Alston v. State352 A.2d 323 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1976)
State v. House320 So. 2d 181 (La. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list