TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corporation, a Body Corporate, Charlie L

Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corporation, a Body Corporate, Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corporation, Peter Bershesky v. Elder Dempster, Charlie L. Henderson v. Elder Dempster, Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corporation, a Body Corporate, Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corporation

Henderson v. The Arundel Corp., a Body Corporate, Charlie L, 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 10, 1967
Docket
No. 11332-11336
Citations
384 F.2d 998

Opinion

384 F.2d 998

Charlie L. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, a body corporate, Appellee. Charlie L. HENDERSON, Appellee, v. The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, Appellant. Peter BERSHESKY et al., Appellants, v. Elder DEMPSTER, Appellee. Charlie L. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. Elder DEMPSTER, Appellee. Peter BERSHESKY et al., Appellants, v. The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, a body corporate, Appellee. Peter BERSHESKY et al., Appellees, v. The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, Appellant.

Nos. 11332-11336.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued November 8, 1967.

Decided November 10, 1967.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; R. Dorsey Watkins, Judge.

Joseph F. Lentz, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for appellants in Nos. 11,332, 11,334, 11,335 and 11,336, and appellees in Nos. 11,333 and 11,337.

Southgate L. Morison, Baltimore, Md. (Ober, Williams & Grimes, Baltimore, Md., and Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, on brief), for appellee in Nos. 11,334 and 11,335.

Walter S. Levin, Baltimore, Md. (Henry M. Decker, Jr., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellants in Nos. 11,333 and 11,337, and appellee in Nos. 11,332 and 11,336.

Before BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, MARVIN JONES, Senior Judge, U. S. Court of Claims, * and CRAVEN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm on the opinion of the district court. Henderson v. Arundel Corporation, 262 F.Supp. 152 (D.Md.1966).

2

Affirmed.

Notes:

* Sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Henderson v. Arundel Corp., 262 F. Supp. 152 (D. Maryland 1966) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list