TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Arnold Oglesby and Virginia E. Oglesby v. Ralston Purina Company

Arnold OGLESBY and Virginia E. Oglesby, Appellants, v. RALSTON PURINA COMPANY, Appellee

Oglesby v. Ralston Purina Co., 385 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 31, 1967
Docket
No. 24455_1
Judges
Tuttle, Bell, Simpson
Citations
385 F.2d 416

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The District Court directed a verdict for appellee in a suit for the balance due on a contract whereunder feed was sold to appellants and turkeys were either sold to or financed for appellants. We find the errors assigned to be without merit. Specifically, the construction of the contract by the court with respect to feed prices was not erroneous nor did the court err in excluding the proferred hearsay testimony and documentary evidence relating to the condition of the turkeys.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 119682026peak 1968 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Ralph Shue385 F.2d 416 (4th Cir. 1968)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Ralph Shue385 F.2d 416 (4th Cir. 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list