Ronald J. Arrias v. The Immigration and Naturalization Service
Ronald J. ARRIAS, Petitioner, v. the IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Opinion
*192 PER CURIAM:
The Immigration and Naturalization Service is hereby substituted as party respondent in place of the State of California and the United States of America (see Immigration and Nationality Act § 106(a) (3), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) (3)). The petition must be dismissed because the petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by section 106(c). Rodriguez-De Leon v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 324 F.2d 311 ; Murillo-Aguilera v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 141 ; Mai Kai Fong v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1962, 305 F.2d 239 ; Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 139 .
Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.