Harry Heller v. Burton Roberts
Harry HELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Burton ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM;
The complaint claims federal jurisdiction “based on the Federal Civil Rights statutes [ 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1983 (1964)], the Constitution of the United States and the 14th Amendment thereto.” Actually, the allegations would appear to be in support of an action for slander arising out of the utterance by defendant, then an Assistant District Attorney, in open court of an allegedly derogatory word concerning plaintiff, a lawyer, admitted to practice in the State of New York. Plaintiff endeavors to bring this action within federal jurisdiction by asserting that he has been deprived “of his property and personal rights and professional status, contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States” by reason of the alleged slander. From an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, plaintiff appeals.
The court below properly held that, construing the complaint most liberally, the alleged slander gives rise to no federal claim and that whatever bases there might be for a tort action under state law “they do not fall within the aegis of the Civil Rights Act.”
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.