TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mary C. Smith v. T. W. Paris

Mary C. SMITH Et Al., Appellants, v. T. W. PARIS Et Al., Appellees

Smith v. T. W. Paris, 386 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 18, 1967
Docket
No. 24250
Judges
Rives, Goldberg, Dyer
Citations
386 F.2d 9791967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4139

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration, we find ouselves in full agreement with the opinion and judgment of the district court reported in 257 F.Supp. 901 , et seq., with one modification.

The applicable State statute provides:

“§ 342.

County executive committee may require that members be elected.

— The county executive committee of any political party of any county in this state may, by a majority vote of said committee, require that members *980 of said committee be elected by the qualified electors of such political party. When such committee adopts a resolution requiring that such members be so elected, candidates for membership on said committee shall file their declaration of candidacy as other state and county officers in the primary election to be held by such political party.” Ala.Code, Tit. 17, § 342.

There appears to be no law prescribing the terms of office of such committee members. The appellants’ brief states that, “Since elections to the Executive Committee are spaced four years apart (Deposition of T. W. Paris, 26, 27), absent a special election, the next election will not take place until 1970.” The ap-pellees respond: “The statement on page 11 of Appellants’ brief, ‘new elections in Barbour County for Committeemen will not take place until 1970,’ is not supported by the evidence, which will be apparent from a careful reading of the deposition of T. W. Parish (sic) on pages 26 & 27.” We find nothing in the evidence from which to determine whether elections to the Barbour County Democratic Executive Committee are spaced four years apart or two years apart.

Beginning in 1940, regular primary elections are held in Alabama on the first Tuesday in May every two years. Code of Ala.1940, Tit. 17, § 340. There is no reason to delay beyond 1968 the relief to which the district court held the plaintiffs (appellants) entitled. See Watson v. City of Memphis, 1963, 373 U.S. 526, 532, 533 , 83 S.Ct. 1314 , 10 L.Ed.2d 529 . To remove any uncertainty, there is added to the judgment of the district court the following: “The present terms of office of members of the Barbour County Democratic Executive Committee shall expire immediately after the results of the primary election to be held in said County on the first Tuesday in May 1968 have been ascertained and declared.” As so modified, the judgment is affiripgd. The costs of this appeal shall bp taxed equally against the appellants and the appellees.

Modified and affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 25 cases

View all citing references →
1968: 11970: 11971: 11972: 31973: 41974: 11975: 21976: 31978: 31979: 11982: 11986: 21988: 219682026peak 1973 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Nevett v. Sides571 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1978)
  2. Albert C. Toney v. N476 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1973)
  3. Moore v. City of Pacific534 S.W.2d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
  4. Chisom v. Edwards690 F. Supp. 1524 (E.D. La. 1988)
  5. Nevett v. Sides571 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1978)
  6. Whitcomb v. Chavis403 U.S. 124 (1971)

Most recent

  1. Chisom v. Edwards690 F. Supp. 1524 (E.D. La. 1988)
  2. Soules v. Kauaians for Nukolii Campaign Committee849 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1988)
  3. Edward W. Gjersten v. The Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago, Ed791 F.2d 472 (7th Cir. 1986)
  4. Gjersten v. Board of Election Commissioners791 F.2d 472 (7th Cir. 1986)
  5. Gartrell v. Knight546 F. Supp. 449 (N.D. Ala. 1982)
  6. Hart v. King470 F. Supp. 1195 (D. Haw. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Watson v. City of Memphis, 373 U.S. 526 (1963) 210
Smith v. Paris, 257 F. Supp. 901 (M.D. Ala. 1966) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list