TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage and Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Antoinette E. Cage, and Dale C. Cage v. New York Central Railroad Company, a Corporation, and v. Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage

Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage and Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Antoinette E. Cage, and Dale C. Cage v. New York Central Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage, Third-Party

Dale C. Cage, Adm'r of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage & Dale C. Cage, Adm'r of the Estate of Antoinette E. Cage, & Dale C. Cage v. N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co., a Corp., & v. Dale C. Cage, Adm'r of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage, 386 F.2d 998 (3d Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 1, 1967
Docket
No. 16560-16562
Citations
386 F.2d 998

Opinion

386 F.2d 998

Dale C. CAGE, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage and Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Antoinette E. Cage, and Dale C. Cage, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dale C. CAGE, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 16560-16562.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued November 7, 1967.

Decided December 1, 1967.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Gerald J. Weber, Judge.

Irving Murphy, MacDonald, Illig, Jones & Britton, Erie, Pa., for appellant.

Leonard E. Price, Price & Bercik, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Louis M. Tarasi, Jr., Burgwin, Ruffin, Perry, Pohl & Springer, Pittsburgh, Pa., James D. Loesch, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

John G. Gent, Erie, Pa., for appellee, third-party defendant (Curtze, Gent & McCullough, Erie, Pa., on the brief).

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an appeal by the New York Central Railroad from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. By its order, the district court granted third-party defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and denied appellant's motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial.

2

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error.

3

The order of the district court will be affirmed on the basis of its well reasoned opinion, Cage v. New York Central R. R., 276 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Pa., 1967).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11991: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.505 F. Supp. 1190 (E.D. Pa. 1980)
  2. Cook v. United States765 F. Supp. 217 (M.D. Penn. 1991)

Most recent

  1. Cook v. United States765 F. Supp. 217 (M.D. Penn. 1991)
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.505 F. Supp. 1190 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Cage v. N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co., 276 F. Supp. 778 (W.D. Pa. 1967) 23
Cage v. N.Y. Cent. R.R., 386 F.2d 998 (3d Cir. 1967) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list