TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roll-Die & Mold Decorators, Inc., and R. C. Gutknecht v. W. J. Voit Rubber Corp.

ROLL-DIE & MOLD DECORATORS, INC., and R. C. Gutknecht, Appellants, v. W. J. VOIT RUBBER CORP., Appellee

Roll-Die & Mold Decorators, Inc. v. W. J. Voit Rubber Corp., 387 F.2d 306 (9th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 23, 1968
Docket
No. 21592_1
Judges
Barnes, Jertberg, McNICHOLS, Per Curiam
Citations
387 F.2d 306

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We find no merit in appellants’ objections relative to jurisdiction, venue, or stay of the trial date, pending Patent Office action. On each of those issues we affirm.

The summary judgment granted below is reversed, upon the ground the record discloses there exist genuine issues of material fact.

In view of this opinion, it is suggested that whatever district court judge tries the contested case, he should reconsider and re-examine the propriety and necessity of the continuation of preliminary injunctive relief.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 119692026peak 1969 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list