TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

T. J. Robert Waters v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

T. J. Robert WATERS, Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee

T. J. Robert Waters v. Beto, 387 F.2d 335 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 21, 1967
Docket
No. 24697
Judges
Thornberry, Ainsworth
Citations
387 F.2d 3351967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4054

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial by the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, after an evidentiary hearing, of a habeas corpus petition filed by a Texas state prisoner. The appellant, represented by two court-appointed counsel, was convicted in 1964 of assault with intent to murder his mother by cutting her with a knife. Appellant was never tried in the companion case in which his father was the alleged victim.

The appellant contended in his habeas corpus petition in the district court that he had ineffective representation of counsel at his trial in the state court; that the prosecutor told the jury he was a mean man and had been run out of the county for a similar offense; and that, being indigent, he was denied the right to take a direct appeal. Appellant also complained that there were no Negroes on the petit jury, although he did not contend that Negroes were systematically excluded.

At the hearing in the district court the appellant, represented by court-appointed counsel, testified in support of his contentions. His two former counsel testified to facts which indicated that they represented him diligently and ably; that the prosecutor had not made the *336 alleged remarks to the jury; and that they advised the appellant on several occasions of his right to appeal but he insisted that he did not desire to appeal, saying that “If I did this to my Mama and my Papa, I need to be locked up.”

We have considered the appellant’s contentions but find them to be wholly without merit. The district court resolved the credibility issues adversely to the appellant; and we find no error in its findings and conclusions.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 11974: 119682026peak 1968 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brown v. Haynes385 F. Supp. 285 (W.D. Mo. 1974)
  2. Ben Herbert Phelper v. Bill Decker, Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas401 F.2d 232 (5th Cir. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Brown v. Haynes385 F. Supp. 285 (W.D. Mo. 1974)
  2. Ben Herbert Phelper v. Bill Decker, Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas401 F.2d 232 (5th Cir. 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list