TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Robert G. Lemaster v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Robert G. LeMASTER, Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee

Lemaster v. Beto, 387 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 28, 1967
Docket
No. 24524
Judges
Tuttle, Gewin, Hunter
Citations
387 F.2d 6121967 U.S. App. LEXIS 3990

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing appellant’s petition for habeas corpus. Appellant has pursued and clearly exhausted all state remedies. He was convicted of robbery by assault, after having plead not guilty by reason of insanity, and was sentenced to serve from five to twenty years.

We are once again concerned with the extent of the duty of a court-appointed attorney to prosecute a first appeal from a criminal conviction, after that attorney has conscientiously determined that there is no merit to the indigent’s appeal. LeMaster made known to his counsel (in the state court) that he was desirous of appealing from the state court conviction. Counsel informed him that there was no merit in an appeal and did no more. Subsequently, LeMaster made inquiry of the state judge concerning appeal and was informed that it was not incumbent upon a court-appointed attorney to appeal a case from the trial court. Nothing more was done and no appeal was filed. Concededly, there was no conscious waiver by LeMaster of the right of appeal. The pertinent facts bring the appellant within the scope of the decision of the Supreme Court in Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the decision of this Court in Schwander v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 386 F.2d 20 .

1

We must reverse the decision of the District Court and remand the case so that the District Court can enter an appropriate order affording LeMaster a review of his conviction on direct appeal as adequate as if he had appealed in the first instance. Schwander v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 386 F.2d 20 ; Lyles v. United States, 346 F.2d 789 (5 Cir. 1966); Pate v. Holman, 341 F.2d 764 (5 Cir. 1965).

Reversed and remanded.

1

. It is noted that the order of the District Court denying the writ was issued prior to the decisions in these cases.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 31969: 31972: 11974: 119682026peak 1968 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) 83,798
Schwander v. United States, 386 F.2d 20 (5th Cir. 1967) 22
Pate v. William C. Holman,, Kilby Prison, Ala., 341 F.2d 764 (5th Cir. 1965) 122
Lyles v. United States, 346 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1965) 27

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list