TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Antonio Tiotico Llacer and Israel E. Gabriel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Llacer v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 388 F.2d 681 (9th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 15, 1968
Docket
No. 21863
Citations
388 F.2d 681

Opinion

388 F.2d 681

Antonio Tiotico LLACER and Israel E. Gabriel, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 21862.

No. 21863.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 15, 1968.

Jack T. Price of Gordon, Kidder & Price, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief of Civil Division, Herbert M. Schoenberg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Steve Suffin, Atty., INS, San Francisco, Ramsey Clark, U. S. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Joseph Sureck, Reg. Counsel, INS, San Pedro, Cal., for respondent.

Before HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and REAL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Petitioners, natives and citizens of the Philippine Islands, were admitted to the United States in 1958 as nonimmigrant students for a period to expire September 20, 1959. Following that date, faced with deportation, they sought discretionary suspension of deportation upon the ground that it would cause them "extreme hardship," under § 244(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a) (1), to return to the Philippines. The Special Inquiry Officer denied this relief. Noting lack of close family ties in the United States, he stated: "The hardship presented by the respondents is only the usual difference in economic standards of living which exist between the United States and other countries abroad." The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed.

2

We find no abuse of discretion.

3

Upon the petition for relief the order of the Special Inquiry Officer is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 21977: 11982: 119702026peak 1970 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list