TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James Andrew Wiley v. United States

James Andrew WILEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Wiley v. United States, 389 F.2d 479 (5th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 29, 1967
Docket
No. 24285_1
Judges
Tuttle, Bell, Simpson
Citations
389 F.2d 479

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered the record in this appeal from a conviction on a four-count indictment charging the appellant with possessing and selling non-taxpaid liquor and carrying on the business of retail liquor dealer without payment of the special tax. We conclude that there is no merit in the contentions that there was an adequate ground of defense by entrapment, or that the conduct of the undercover agents violated the constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure. See Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), and Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 , 87 S.Ct. 424 , 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966).

It appearing that there was no error in the conduct of the trial, the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 21970: 11978: 11980: 119692026peak 1969 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 (1966) 1,761
Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 (1967) 706

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list