Arthur R. Decatur v. United States
Arthur R. DeCATUR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Decatur v. United States, 392 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1968)
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Appellant mainly relies on a claim of illegal search and seizure. It is possible that there was an exploratory search too broad to be properly incident to De-Catur’s arrest. But it would appear that all of the tangible real objects offered in evidence were seized from points immediately adjacent to the spot where De-Catur was arrested. If some item crept into evidence that was illegally seized, no record was made in the trial court and we are not told what it was.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.