TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thelma A. Diedrich v. Zoning Commission of the District of Columbia

Thelma A. DIEDRICH Et Al., Appellants, v. ZONING COMMISSION OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Et Al., Appellees

Diedrich v. Zoning Comm'n of the Dist. of Columbia, 393 F.2d 666 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 24, 1968
Docket
No. 20846
Judges
Bazelon, Pretty-Man, Burger
Citations
393 F.2d 666129 U.S. App. D.C. 2651968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8304

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

In respect to zoning, Congress by statute 1

created a Commission which it empowered to control, among other things, the population dénsity throughout the District of Columbia and for that purpose to prepare comprehensive plans and publish maps depicting the plans. Many factors were mentioned in the statute, including congestion in the streets, safety from fire, panic and other dangers, health, light, air, transportation, civic activity, recreation, education, and so on. Such a map, depicting the area here involved, was promulgated in 1958 as part of comprehensive zoning changes in the City.

On November 27, 1965 (some seven years thereafter) appellant-owners applied to the Commission for an amendment to the map.

2

The Commission, after public hearing, declined. The owners sued in the District Court for a mandatory injunction. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial judge denied plaintiffs’ motion and entered judgment for the Commission. This appeal followed. We affirm. The functions of the Commission in preparing and promulgating plans and maps are obviously exercises of judgment legislative in character and are subject to judicial control only if arbitrary or capricious.

3

Since we cannot say that the challenged action was devoid of evidentiary support or irrational, we are obliged to affirm.

Affirmed.

1

. D.C.Code § 5-413 (1967).

2

. D.C.Code § 5-415 (1967).

3

. Lewis v. District of Columbia, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 72, 74 , 190 F.2d 25, 27 (D.C.Cir. 1951).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1971: 21972: 31973: 51977: 11978: 11982: 119712026peak 1973 · 5

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lewis v. Dist. of Columbia, 190 F.2d 25 (D.C. Cir. 1951) 26

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list