TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

P. D. Marchessini & Co. (New York), Inc. v. H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc.

P. D. MARCHESSINI & CO. (NEW YORK), Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H. W. ROBINSON & CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee

P. D. Marchessini & Co. (N.Y.) v. H. W. Robinson & Co., 394 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 9, 1968
Docket
No. 32084_1
Judges
Waterman, Friendly, Kaufman
Citations
394 F.2d 1211968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7000

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

P. D. Marchessini & Co. (New York), Inc., a steamship operator, appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing a libel against H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc., a freight forwarder. The libel sought damages of $201,500 for breach of a contract for the shipment of 260 locomotive trucks, weighing 1057 long tons and occupying 156,000 cubic feet of space, from New York to Yokohama. The contract was evidenced by a “booking note” executed on behalf of Robinson by Edward C. Boyens, who was listed in a standard trade publication under Robinson’s name and advertisement opposite the rubric “Export Department.”

We need not determine whether, despite the absence of any statement in the booking note that Robinson was acting only as agent for an undisclosed shipper, the dealings between the parties did not make this sufficiently plain to Marchessini as to preclude its recovering against Robinson as a principal. See ALI, Restatement 2d, Agency, § 322, § 336, comment d (1958); 2 Williston, Contracts, § 283-85 (3d ed. 1959). Assuming this point in Marehessini’s favor, it still had the burden of establishing Boy-ens’ authority to bind Robinson. The absence of actual authority is clear, and the judge was warranted in concluding that Marchessini had not established apparent authority. Although Marches-sini’s policy was to attempt to obtain signed booking contracts from freight forwarders, Robinson’s policy was to avoid such signature. Boyens denied having signed any previous booking notes with Marchessini except on a single occasion when he had specific authority from the shipper and signed in a manner making plain that Robinson was acting solely as agent for a named principal. There was no evidence that he had apparent authority to commit his employer, for a small commission, to *122 a contract that would entail large liabilities to the steamship operator in the event of default by a client whose conduct was beyond its control.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 21977: 119722026peak 1972 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Theodore G. Daley564 F.2d 645 (2d Cir. 1977)
  2. United States v. Robert W. Ellis461 F.2d 962 (2d Cir. 1972)
  3. Orient Mid-East Lines v. Albert E. Bowen, Inc.458 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1972)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Theodore G. Daley564 F.2d 645 (2d Cir. 1977)
  2. United States v. Robert W. Ellis461 F.2d 962 (2d Cir. 1972)
  3. Orient Mid-East Lines v. Albert E. Bowen, Inc.458 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list