Milton D. Lizana v. State of Alabama
Milton D. LIZANA, Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The district court denied this habeas corpus petition filed by an Alabama state prisoner for failure “to exhaust his presently available State remedies.” It is true that appellant has failed to appeal from the denial of his coram nobis petition, and the six-month period allowed for appeal from that order of May 21, 1967, had not expired when he filed his petition below on September 25, 1967, or when the court denied that petition. See Allen v. State, 42 Ala.App. 9 , 150 So.2d 399, 401 (1963). Nevertheless, the appeal period has now expired and there is no state remedy presently available to determine the validity of appellant’s claims which concern matters dehors the record. Hence, we hold that the exhaustion requirements of 28 U.S. C.A. § 2254 have been met, since appellant presently has no available state remedy. Bell v. State of Alabama, 5 Cir., 367 F.2d 243 .
We conclude, therefore, that a return and an evidentiary hearing must be held.
The judgment is reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.