TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Southern Pacific Company v. Joe J. Jordan

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joe J. JORDAN, Appellee

Southern Pac. Co. v. Jordan, 395 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 4, 1968
Docket
No. 24228_1
Judges
Tuttle, Gewin, God-Bold
Citations
395 F.2d 209

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Recognizing, as we do, the limitations upon our power of review of jury verdicts, we are unable to do otherwise than affirm the judgment of the trial court in this railroad crossing damage suit. Viewing the evidence most strongly in favor of the appellee, as we must, we cannot say that there was insufficient evidence to warrant submission of the case to the jury on the issue of discovered peril, as contended by the appellant. There is no merit in the appellant’s criticism of the trial court’s supplemental charge which appellant likens to the “Allen or dynamite” charge in criminal cases. Reading the charge as a whole, as we must, we find no reversible errors in the manner in which the case was submitted to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 11971: 21974: 219702026peak 1971 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
C. W. Henderson v. United States, 395 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1968) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list