TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Euclid National Bank v. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation

EUCLID NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Defendants-Appellees

Euclid Nat'l Bank v. The Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd. & the Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp., 396 F.2d 950 (6th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 14, 1968
Docket
No. 17831
Judges
O'Sullivan, McCree, Combs
Citations
396 F.2d 950

Opinion

ORDER This is an appeal by the Euclid National Bank, formerly Euclid Savings Association, from a judgment of the District Court which holds that the bank is not entitled to recover certain insurance premiums paid to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.

The Euclid Savings Association was converted from an Ohio chartered building and loan association to the Euclid National Bank on February 1,1966. During its life as a building and loan association its savings accounts were insured by the appellee Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation under the provisions of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1727 . When it became a national bank its deposits were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Under the terms of the National Housing Act the Euclid Savings Association became obligated on November 21, 1965, to pay an annual premium in advance to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. One-half of the premium was paid in November, 1965, and the other one-half was deferred to April, 1966, and then paid pursuant to demand. The bank contends that the portion of the premium covering the period beyond February 1, 1966, when it became a national bank, is unearned and should be returned to it.

The trial judge held in a well reasoned memorandum opinion, D.C., 286 F.Supp. 125 , that there is no federal statute or agency regulation applicable to this situation and, in the absence of an express agreement or one that may be implied in law, the rule is that “an insured may not have any part of his premium returned once the risk attaches, even if it eventually turns out that the premium was in part unearned.” Citing Fleetwood Acres v. Federal Housing Administration, 171 F.2d 440, 442 (2nd Cir. 1948).

For the reasons stated in the District Judge’s memorandum opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 11975: 21980: 12021: 319742026peak 2021 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Fleetwood Acres, Inc. v. Fed. Hous. Admin., 171 F.2d 440 (2d Cir. 1948) 11
Euclid Nat'l Bank v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., 286 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Ohio 1966) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list