TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Benny Lee Whalen v. United States

Benny Lee WHALEN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Whalen v. United States, 398 F.2d 286 (8th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 12, 1968
Docket
No. 18963_1
Judges
Matthes, Mehaffy, Lay
Citations
398 F.2d 2861968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6132

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of unlawful possession for purpose of sale and unlawful sale and delivery of d-amphetamine sulfate powder, a “depressant or stimulant drug” within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 321 (v) (2).

The illegal sale or possession of depressant or stimulant drugs is prohibited by 21 U.S.C. § 331 (q) (2) and (3), whether or not the drugs have been sold or shipped in interstate commerce at any time. The sole question here is the constitutionality of the applicable statutes. Appellant contends that they are unconstitutional in that the 1965 amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act exceed the constitutional grant of power to Congress over interstate commerce under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution.

The identical question was decided adversely to appellant’s contention in White v. United States, 399 F.2d 813 (8th Cir. July 9, 1968). We affirm on the basis of the soundly reasoned opinion in White, supra. See also, Deyo v. United States, 396 F.2d 595 (9th Cir., June 5, 1968).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 31972: 219692026peak 1969 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Robert Karl Funk, Jr.412 F.2d 452 (8th Cir. 1969)
  2. United States v. Amado Lopez and Thomas Llerena459 F.2d 949 (5th Cir. 1972)
  3. United States v. Robert Cerrito413 F.2d 1270 (7th Cir. 1969)
  4. United States v. Gregory Lamear, Donald L. McEntire Phyllis Sparks417 F.2d 626 (8th Cir. 1969)
  5. United States v. Warwar346 F. Supp. 90 (D.P.R. 1972)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Amado Lopez and Thomas Llerena459 F.2d 949 (5th Cir. 1972)
  2. United States v. Warwar346 F. Supp. 90 (D.P.R. 1972)
  3. United States v. Gregory Lamear, Donald L. McEntire Phyllis Sparks417 F.2d 626 (8th Cir. 1969)
  4. United States v. Robert Cerrito413 F.2d 1270 (7th Cir. 1969)
  5. United States v. Robert Karl Funk, Jr.412 F.2d 452 (8th Cir. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
White v. United States, 399 F.2d 813 (8th Cir. 1968) 58
Deyo v. United States, 396 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1968) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list