TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Phillip Coggins

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Phillip COGGINS, Appellant

United States v. Coggins, 398 F.2d 668 (4th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 21, 1968
Docket
No. 12085
Judges
Haynsworth, Bryan, Winter
Citations
398 F.2d 6681968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6408

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Coggins, a District of Columbia prisoner, was convicted of escape after he failed to return to Lorton Reformatory from a Christmas one-day furlough. He had been instructed to return to Lorton by a bus leaving the District of Columbia at 9:00 o’clock on Christmas night and to telephone Lorton in the event of an emergency. He failed to meet the bus, but a bit later he did telephone Lorton twice.

According to him, on the second call the unknown speaker at Lorton instructed him to turn himself in at the District of Columbia jail. It is not contended that this instruction reasonably could have been understood to have meant anything other than that he was to turn himself in for transportation back to Lorton.

Coggins failed to turn himself in to the District of Columbia jail, and he did nothing else to return to Lorton. Six days later he was arrested in the District of Columbia and returned involuntarily to Lorton.

We affirm the conviction of escape. While on furlough he remained in the custody of the Attorney General. The fact that he missed the bus returning to Lorton at 9:00 o’clock on Christmas night would not have appeared to have been willful at the time of his two phone calls, but his failure to return to Lorton at the end of his furlough became clearly willful when he did not turn himself in at the District of Columbia jail or take any other steps to return to Lorton during the next six days;

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1974: 21976: 21978: 11979: 11981: 11988: 12003: 22016: 12025: 119742026peak 1974 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Clifford Bailey, United States of America v585 F.2d 1087 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  2. United States v. Alvin Odell Cluck542 F.2d 728 (8th Cir. 1976)
  3. United States v. Miguel Rosa-Ortiz348 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2003)
  4. Lambert v. Commonwealth367 S.E.2d 745 (Va. Ct. App. 1988)
  5. Mundine v. United States431 A.2d 16 (D.C. 1981)
  6. Smith v. State361 A.2d 237 (Del. 1976)

Most recent

  1. Antonio Lee Franklin v. Commonwealth of VirginiaNo. 1119243 (Va. Ct. App. July 8, 2025)
  2. State v. Paris.378 P.3d 970 (Haw. 2016) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  3. In re Amparo-Concep v.No. 01-2593 (1st Cir. Oct. 28, 2003)
  4. United States v. Miguel Rosa-Ortiz348 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2003)
  5. Lambert v. Commonwealth367 S.E.2d 745 (Va. Ct. App. 1988)
  6. Mundine v. United States431 A.2d 16 (D.C. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list